The … industrialization of camera technology only carried out a promise inherent in photography from its very beginning: to democratize all experiences by translating them into images.
- Susan Sontag, On Photography
Such democratization’s most-obvious expression, its adherents might say, is the photoblog. There’s no obvious shortage of them —a href=”http://www.photoblogs.org/”>photoblogs.org</a> currently lists over 1100, with new ones being added four or five each day.
The aforementioned site bills itself as a guide to “high-quality photoblogs.” Their definition of “high quality” leaves me skeptical. They cite four criteria in their FAQ:
- Photo Quality
- Photo Freshness
- Photo Quantity
The sub-criterion for “quality” is simply stated “are the photos well done?” For the sake of democratic breadth (or was it really to patronize demographics?), they seem to be aiming awfully low.
The last two are more troublesome, because they imply that volume equates to quality. Personally, I’d rather find a website with two amazing photos than a website that floods the webspace with hundreds of repetetive and uninspired ones. Yet it’s precisesly the latter type that seems to dominate, with “new photos every day” being held-aloft as the zenith of photographic excellence.
It’s a disease that seems to have infected even sites like 21mm.net where there are genuinely good photos amid a mass of banal ones. Are the photobloggers simply unable to distinguish?
One might argue that this torrent of “unaffected” imagery is needed in order to create some as-yet-unnamed New Aesthetic — I find it more fashion statement than artistic movement. The photos I find in the top100 sites all seem to cave-into the pattern of “conform and confirm,” either pounding on familiar safe notions (flowers and vividly-colored fruits, one-light nudes on black, raggedly texture-filled homeless people), or worse getting caught-up in the factory-manufactured signifiers of “quirky” and “independant” photography (toy cameras & lomos, cross-processing, rock bands).
I wonder if anyone has yet undertaken any kind of sustained, rigourous attempt to deconstruct the photoblogiverse.